logo
Courses Blog Contact Us AboutUs Login

DevOps Tasks Simplified Practical Examples

Note:
 DevOps tasks and solutions mentioned in this blog are provided as references and guidelines only. Actual implementations may vary based on individual requirements, project contexts, and personal preferences. Always adapt and validate solutions according to your specific use-case.


  Task 1: Automated Code Analysis with SonarQube Requirement: Development team needs automated code analysis for the dev branch. 

Implementation: Configure GitHub Actions workflow to:

  • Trigger on pull requests to the dev branch
  • Run SonarQube analysis using the SonarScanner
  • Publish reports to SonarQube dashboard
  • Add quality gates that block merges if critical issues are found
  • Send notification to Slack channel with analysis results
Task 2: Container Image Vulnerability Scanning with Trivy Requirement: All container images must be scanned for vulnerabilities before deployment. 
Implementation: Set up GitLab CI pipeline to:
  • Build container images
  • Scan images with Trivy for security vulnerabilities
  • Generate HTML reports of findings
  • Fail builds if critical or high vulnerabilities are found
  • Store scan results as pipeline artifacts
  • Block deployment to staging/production if vulnerabilities exceed threshold
Task 3: Dependency Management with JFrog Artifactory Requirement: Centralize and secure package management across projects. 
Implementation: Configure JFrog Artifactory to:
  • Create repositories for different package types (npm, Maven, Docker, etc.)
  • Implement virtual repositories to proxy public repositories
  • Set up JFrog Xray to scan all artifacts for vulnerabilities
  • Configure build integration with Jenkins to publish artifacts
  • Implement retention policies to clean up old artifacts
  • Generate monthly dependency compliance reports
Task 4: OWASP ZAP Security Testing Requirement: Regular security scanning of web applications.
Implementation: Implement Jenkins pipeline to:
  • Deploy application to isolated testing environment
  • Run OWASP ZAP automated scans against the application
  • Generate comprehensive security reports
  • Tag identified vulnerabilities in issue tracking system
  • Schedule weekly baseline scans
  • Generate trend analysis of security posture over time
Task 5: Secret Detection and Management Requirement: Prevent secrets from being committed to code repositories. 
Implementation: Set up a comprehensive secrets management solution:
  • Configure pre-commit hooks using GitLeaks to detect secrets locally
  • Implement HashiCorp Vault for secrets storage and rotation
  • Set up GitHub Actions workflow to scan for leaked secrets with tools like TruffleHog
  • Create audit logs of all secrets access
  • Implement automatic rotation of service account credentials
  • Send alerts when potential secrets are detected in code
Each of these tasks demonstrates the integration of security tools into the DevOps workflow, creating a robust DevSecOps approach that addresses code quality, vulnerability management, and compliance requirements. Retry BP Create a Tasks with helm charts, hashi corp vault configuration setup, compose with problem statement outcomes and eats. Edit Here's a comprehensive DevOps task focused on Helm charts and HashiCorp Vault configuration: 

  Task: Secure Kubernetes Secret Management with Helm and HashiCorp Vault 

Problem Statement : The organization is experiencing several challenges with Kubernetes secret management:

  1. Secrets are stored as base64-encoded values in version-controlled Kubernetes manifests
  2. No audit trail exists for secret access
  3. Secret rotation requires manual pod restarts
  4. Application teams have varying levels of access to production secrets
  5. Different environments (dev/staging/prod) require different secret handling
Desired Outcomes
  1. Centralized secret management with proper access controls
  2. Automated secret rotation without service disruption
  3. Complete audit logging of all secret access
  4. Seamless integration with existing CI/CD pipelines
  5. Consistent secret handling across all environments
Implementation Tasks 1. HashiCorp Vault Infrastructure Setup
  • Deploy Vault using the official Helm chart in HA configuration
  • Configure Vault with auto-unseal using cloud KMS
  • Set up a proper backup strategy for Vault data
  • Implement audit logging to a centralized log management system
  • Create Vault policies for different teams and service accounts
# vault-values.yaml (Helm values file excerpt) server: ha: enabled: true replicas: 3 dataStorage: enabled: true size: 10Gi storageClass: "managed-premium" auditStorage: enabled: true size: 20Gi extraEnvironmentVars: VAULT_CACERT: /vault/userconfig/vault-server-tls/vault.ca extraVolumes: - type: secret name: vault-server-tls 

  2. Vault Authentication Configuration

  • Set up Kubernetes authentication method for Vault
  • Configure OIDC authentication for human operators
  • Create authentication roles with appropriate policies
  • Implement approle authentication for CI/CD pipelines
  • Document authentication workflows for different personas
3. Secret Engine Configuration
  • Deploy KV v2 secret engine for static secrets
  • Configure dynamic database credentials with automatic rotation
  • Set up PKI secrets engine for certificate management
  • Implement transit engine for encryption as a service
  • Create appropriate backend mounts for different environments
4. Helm Chart Development for Application Integration
  • Create a Helm chart template for Vault Agent Injector
  • Define annotation templates for pod injection
  • Configure template files for secret rendering
  • Set up appropriate service accounts with Vault authentication
  • Create a custom library chart for reusing Vault integration patterns
# Example annotations for a deployment template annotations: vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject: "true" vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject-secret-config.json: "{{ .Values.vault.secretPath }}" vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject-template-config.json: | {{` {{- with secret "{{ .Values.vault.secretPath }}" -}} { "dbUser": "{{ .Data.data.username }}", "dbPassword": "{{ .Data.data.password }}", "apiKey": "{{ .Data.data.api_key }}" } {{- end -}} `}} vault.hashicorp.com/role: "{{ .Values.vault.role }}" 5. CI/CD Integration and Testing
  • Update CI/CD pipelines to retrieve secrets from Vault
  • Implement automated testing for Vault integration
  • Create end-to-end test suite for secret rotation scenarios
  • Document failure recovery procedures
  • Develop monitoring dashboards for Vault health and usage
Success Metrics
  • Zero secrets stored in plain text or base64 in version control
  • 100% of applications using Vault for secret management
  • Mean time to rotate all secrets < 30 minutes
  • Secret rotation causes zero downtime
  • Complete audit trail for all secret access
This task combines infrastructure setup, security configuration, and application integration to solve a critical security challenge in Kubernetes environments using industry-standard tools like Helm and HashiCorp Vault. 

Kubernetes Manifest to Helm Chart Migration Project Problem Statement The company currently manages its Kubernetes deployments through individual manifests, leading to several challenges:
  1. Configuration Duplication: Common settings are repeated across multiple manifests
  2. Versioning Challenges: Difficult to maintain consistent versioning across related resources
  3. Environment Management: Manual changes required when promoting applications across environments
  4. Deployment Complexity: Multi-step deployment processes that are error-prone
  5. Limited Rollback Capability: Difficult to roll back to previous known-good states
  6. Lack of Templating: Unable to parameterize environment-specific values
  7. Maintenance Overhead: High effort required to update common patterns across all services
Expected Outcomes
  1. Standardized Deployment Process: Consistent deployment methods across all applications
  2. Environment Parity: Guaranteed identical application structure across environments with only configured differences
  3. Version Control: Each application release represented by a specific chart version
  4. Simplified Rollbacks: One-command rollback to previous application states
  5. Reduced Duplication: Common configurations extracted to shared templates
  6. Self-Documenting Infrastructure: Chart structure provides documentation of application components
  7. Improved Developer Experience: Simplified local development and testing
  8. Auditable Changes: Clear history of what changed between releases
  9. Scalable Management: Ability to manage dozens or hundreds of services efficiently
Implementation Timeline Total ETA: 12 Weeks Phase 1: Assessment & Planning (2 weeks)
  • Inventory all existing Kubernetes resources
  • Group resources by application/service
  • Identify deployment dependencies
  • Document environment-specific configurations
  • Create migration priority list based on application criticality
Phase 2: Tooling & Standards (2 weeks)
  • Set up Helm chart repository (e.g., ChartMuseum, Harbor, Artifactory)
  • Establish chart structure standards and naming conventions
  • Create CI/CD pipeline for chart packaging and publishing
  • Develop testing framework for charts
  • Define chart versioning strategy
Phase 3: Development & Migration (6 weeks)
  • Create common library charts for shared components
  • Develop initial charts for priority applications
  • Implement templating for environment-specific values
  • Migrate applications in batches, starting with non-critical services
  • Validate deployments in development environment
Phase 4: Validation & Rollout (2 weeks)
  • Comprehensive testing across all environments
  • Documentation and knowledge transfer
  • Final migration of remaining applications
  • Decommission legacy deployment methods
  • Establish ongoing chart maintenance processes
Best Practices Chart Structure
  • One Chart Per Application: Group related microservices that deploy together
  • Subchart Usage: Use subcharts for components that can be deployed independently
  • Common Library: Create a common library chart for shared templates and helpers
  • Flat Structure: Keep chart directory structure simple and navigable:
my-app/ ├── Chart.yaml ├── values.yaml ├── values-dev.yaml ├── values-prod.yaml ├── templates/ │ ├── deployment.yaml │ ├── service.yaml │ ├── ingress.yaml │ ├── configmap.yaml │ ├── secret.yaml │ └── _helpers.tpl └── charts/ # For subcharts if needed Values Management
  • Default Values: Provide sensible defaults in the main values.yaml
  • Environment Overlays: Create separate value files for each environment
  • External Secrets: Use external secret management solutions for sensitive values
  • Comment Everything: Add detailed comments for each value
  • Group Related Values: Organize values by functional area
Templating
  • Avoid Logic in Templates: Keep templates simple and move complexity to values
  • Named Templates: Use named templates for repeated elements
  • Validation: Add template validation with required values
  • Consistent Labeling: Apply consistent labels via helpers
  • Resource Naming: Create standardized resource naming conventions
Deployment & CI/CD
  • Chart Testing: Use helm lint and helm template in CI
  • Chart Museum: Implement a chart repository for version management
  • Semantic Versioning: Apply semantic versioning to charts
  • GitOps: Implement GitOps workflows for deployments
  • Gradual Rollout: Use canary or blue/green deployments for critical applications
Documentation
  • README: Include detailed README for each chart
  • Notes: Use NOTES.txt to display post-installation instructions
  • Dependencies: Document all chart dependencies
  • Examples: Provide example values for different scenarios
  • Architectural Diagrams: Include diagrams showing component relationships
This migration will significantly improve deployment reliability, reduce operational overhead, and provide a foundation for scaling Kubernetes operations as the company grows. 

  AWS IAM User and Policy Management Automation Problem Statement Our organization faces significant challenges with manual AWS IAM user and policy management:  

  1. Risk of Human Error: Manual creation of IAM users and policies frequently results in misconfiguration, over-privileged accounts, and security vulnerabilities.
  2. Inconsistent Permissions: Without standardized provisioning, similar roles receive inconsistent permissions across teams and projects.
  3. Compliance Violations: Manual processes make it difficult to enforce and document compliance with security standards like SOC2, ISO27001, and internal policies.
  4. Onboarding/Offboarding Delays: Current manual processes take 2-3 business days to complete user provisioning or deprovisioning, creating productivity barriers and security risks.
  5. Lack of Audit Trail: Changes to IAM permissions lack proper documentation of who made changes, why they were made, and whether they were approved.
  6. Scale Limitations: As our AWS footprint grows across multiple accounts, manual IAM management has become increasingly time-consuming and error-prone.
  7. Secret Management Risks: Access key creation and distribution processes lack consistent security controls.
  8. Inadequate Lifecycle Management: Access credentials and permissions aren't systematically reviewed or rotated, creating dormant risks.
Documentation Solution Overview This solution automates AWS IAM user and policy management using infrastructure as code, CI/CD pipelines, and approval workflows to ensure secure, consistent, and auditable access management. Repository Structure iam-management/ ├── README.md # Solution documentation ├── environments/ # Environment-specific configurations │ ├── dev/ │ │ ├── main.tf # Environment entry point │ │ ├── terraform.tfvars # Environment variables │ │ └── backend.tf # State configuration │ ├── staging/ │ └── prod/ ├── modules/ # Reusable Terraform modules │ ├── iam-users/ # User management module │ │ ├── main.tf │ │ ├── variables.tf │ │ ├── outputs.tf │ │ └── README.md │ ├── iam-policies/ # Policy management module │ │ ├── main.tf │ │ ├── variables.tf │ │ ├── outputs.tf │ │ └── README.md │ └── iam-groups/ # Group management module │ ├── main.tf │ ├── variables.tf │ ├── outputs.tf │ └── README.md ├── scripts/ # Utility scripts │ ├── validate-policies.sh # Policy validation │ ├── rotate-access-keys.sh # Automated key rotation │ └── compliance-check.sh # Pre-deployment checks ├── policies/ # Policy templates and definitions │ ├── templates/ # Reusable policy templates │ │ ├── read-only.json │ │ └── admin.json │ └── custom/ # Custom service-specific policies ├── .github/ # CI/CD workflows │ └── workflows/ │ ├── validate.yml # PR validation workflow │ ├── apply.yml # Deployment workflow │ └── compliance.yml # Compliance scanning └── docs/ # Extended documentation ├── user-guide.md # User request process ├── admin-guide.md # Administration guide └── architecture.md # Technical architecture User Workflow
  1. Requesting Access
    • Create a branch in the IAM management repository
    • Modify the appropriate user definition file
    • Submit a pull request with the required access justification
  2. Approval Process
    • Automated validation checks run on the pull request
    • Required approvers from security and platform teams review
    • Compliance validation against organizational policies
  3. Implementation
    • Merge triggers the CI/CD pipeline
    • Terraform plan is generated and requires final approval
    • Changes are applied to the AWS environment
    • Access credentials are securely distributed to requesters
Administrator Tasks
  1. Policy Management
    • Define policies using modular templates
    • Apply least-privilege principles
    • Version control all policy changes
  2. Audit and Compliance
    • Generate reports of all IAM resources
    • Track changes through Git history
    • Schedule regular access reviews
  3. Maintenance
    • Quarterly policy reviews
    • Automated access key rotation
    • Inactive user detection and cleanup
Security Controls
  1. Separation of Duties
    • Requesters cannot approve their own changes
    • Production environments require additional approvals
    • Critical resources have enhanced protection
  2. Least Privilege Enforcement
    • Policy analyzer validates permission boundaries
    • Prevents common over-permissioning patterns
    • Recommends scope reductions
  3. Emergency Procedures
    • Break-glass access process
    • Automated incident response
    • Rollback capabilities
Monitoring and Alerting
  1. Access Monitoring
    • CloudTrail integration for activity monitoring
    • Alerts for suspicious activity patterns
    • Dashboard for access metrics
  2. Compliance Monitoring
    • Scheduled drift detection
    • Automated compliance scanning
    • Reporting for audit requirements
Troubleshooting
  1. Common Issues
    • Pipeline failure resolution steps
    • Permission validation procedures
    • Access request debugging
  2. Support Process
    • Escalation procedures
    • Contact information
    • SLAs for request processing
Automated Image Tag Validation and Updating for Helm Deployments Problem Statement Our organization is experiencing several critical challenges with our container image deployment process:
  1. Manual Image Tag Updates: Engineers manually update image tags in Helm values.yaml files across multiple environments, leading to frequent human errors and inconsistencies.
  2. Deployment Failures: Invalid or non-existent image tags cause approximately 23% of our production deployment failures, resulting in extended downtime and delayed feature releases.
  3. Lack of Validation: No systematic verification exists to ensure image tags in values.yaml files correspond to actual images in our container registry before deployment attempts.
  4. Environment Inconsistency: Different environments (dev, staging, prod) frequently run inconsistent image versions due to incomplete propagation of tag updates.
  5. Audit Challenges: The current process lacks a clear audit trail of which image versions were deployed when and by whom.
  6. Release Coordination: Multiple teams updating shared infrastructure lack coordination mechanisms, creating deployment conflicts and race conditions.
  7. Version Control Integration: Image tag updates are not properly integrated with our Git-based deployment workflow, bypassing standard review processes.
Expected Outcomes
  1. Automated Image Tag Updates: A CI/CD pipeline component that automatically updates image tags in values.yaml files based on successful builds or promotion decisions.
  2. Pre-deployment Validation: Automated verification of image tag existence in the container registry before any deployment is attempted.
  3. Standardized Process: A uniform process for image tag updates that works consistently across all environments and applications.
  4. Environment Promotion Flow: Clear progression of validated images from development to staging to production with appropriate controls.
  5. Complete Audit Trail: Comprehensive logging of all image tag updates, including who initiated the change, when it was made, and validation results.
  6. Rollback Capability: Ability to quickly revert to previous known-good image tags when issues are detected.
  7. Developer Self-Service: Enable developers to promote images through environments while maintaining proper controls and validation.
Implementation Approach
  1. Create Image Validation Service:
    • Develop a service that queries container registries (Docker Hub, ECR, GCR, etc.)
    • Implement tag existence validation and image scanning triggers
    • Provide API for integration with CI/CD systems
  2. Build Tag Update Automation:
    • Create pipeline component for Helm values.yaml updates
    • Implement proper Git operations (branch, commit, PR)
    • Support for template variables in values files
  3. Design Environment Promotion Workflow:
    • Define environment progression rules
    • Implement approval gates between environments
    • Create promotion API and UI
  4. Integrate with Existing CI/CD:
    • Add validation steps to existing pipelines
    • Insert tag update steps at appropriate points
    • Implement failure handling and notifications
  5. Develop Rollback Mechanism:
    • Create automated rollback triggers
    • Maintain rollback history
    • Implement safe rollback verification
Example Implementation in GitLab CI stages: - build - validate - update-dev - deploy-dev - update-staging - deploy-staging - update-prod - deploy-prod build-image: stage: build script: - docker build -t $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHA . - docker push $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHA artifacts: variables: IMAGE_TAG: $CI_COMMIT_SHA validate-image: stage: validate script: - ./scripts/validate-image.sh $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHA update-dev-image-tag: stage: update-dev script: - ./scripts/update-helm-values.sh environments/dev/values.yaml image.tag $CI_COMMIT_SHA - git config --global user.email "ci@example.com" - git config --global user.name "CI Bot" - git add environments/dev/values.yaml - git commit -m "Update dev image tag to $CI_COMMIT_SHA" - git push origin $CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME Benefits
  1. Reduced Deployment Failures: Eliminate the 23% of failures caused by invalid image tags through pre-validation.
  2. Accelerated Deployment Cycles: Streamline the image update process, reducing deployment time by an estimated 35%.
  3. Improved Developer Experience: Free engineers from manual yaml editing and provide clear visibility into deployment status.
  4. Enhanced Security: Ensure only validated, scanned images proceed to deployment.
  5. Better Compliance: Maintain comprehensive audit trails of all deployments for compliance and troubleshooting.
  6. Consistent Environments: Guarantee that environments use validated images and progress through proper promotion channels.
  7. Coordinated Releases: Enable multiple teams to coordinate their releases without conflicts.
  8. Simplified Rollbacks: Reduce mean time to recovery (MTTR) with fast, reliable rollbacks to previous image versions.
  9. Process Standardization: Enforce consistent workflows across teams and applications regardless of technology stack.
  10. Increased Trust: Build confidence in the deployment process among both technical and non-technical stakeholders.

Bhavani prasad
Cloud And Devops Engineer

Launch your GraphyLaunch your Graphy
100K+ creators trust Graphy to teach online
𝕏
Hitech Minds 2025 Privacy policy Terms of use Contact us Refund policy